Topic 8 has no equations and only four sub-topics, which makes it look like an easy topic and makes it examined like a precision one. Water leaves a leaf as water vapour, not water. Xylem carries mineral ions, not minerals. Phloem carries sucrose, not sugar and not glucose. Water evaporates from the mesophyll and then diffuses out of the stomata — two verbs, two marks. Water is pulled up, never pushed or sucked. And translocation is not always downwards. Twelve traps, six walkthroughs, six lookalike pairs, a concept map and ten full practice questions below — every one aimed at a place where a sensible-sounding sentence earns nothing.
Twelve traps that cost marks on Topic 8 challenge papers. Every one is an answer that sounds right and that mark schemes refuse.
Six challenge-level questions worked through in the order you should actually think about them. Try each part before revealing the next step.
Z has nothing blocked, so it shows what a normal leaf loses: 0.71 g. Y has everything blocked, so it shows what is lost by routes other than the stomata: 0.03 g. Identifying these two before touching W and X is what turns four numbers into an argument.
Blocking the upper surface (W) reduced the loss only from 0.71 to 0.62 g. Blocking the lower surface (X) reduced it from 0.71 to 0.14 g. So most of the water was leaving through the lower surface, and therefore most of the stomata are on the lower surface. Notice the last step: the data tell you where the water went, and one further sentence converts that into a conclusion about stomata.
Y measures water lost through the cuticle and through any imperfection in the wax seal. Its small value (0.03 g) means the differences between the other leaves can safely be attributed to the stomata. It also shows the cuticle is not perfectly waterproof — small, but not zero.
Leaf W has only its lower surface working, so its stomatal loss through the lower surface is 0.62 − 0.03 = 0.59 g. Leaf X has only its upper surface working: 0.14 − 0.03 = 0.11 g. The lower surface loses more than five times as much. Quoting a ratio like that is very often worth a mark on its own.
84 ÷ 12 = 7.0 mm per minute. The working line earns a mark of its own, so write the division out even if you can do it in your head, and never leave the unit off — a number without a unit is not a rate.
The increase is 158 − 84 = 74 mm. As a percentage of the original: 74 ÷ 84 × 100 = 88 %. The tempting alternative, 158 ÷ 84 × 100 = 188 %, is the new value as a percentage of the old one, which is a different quantity. Read the question and decide which it wants before you touch the calculator.
The bag traps the water vapour lost from the leaves, so the air around the shoot becomes very humid. The water vapour concentration gradient between the air spaces and the outside air becomes much shallower, so less vapour diffuses out through the stomata and uptake falls from 84 to 19 mm. Three linked ideas, three marks.
A potometer measures the rate of water uptake. Some of the water taken in is used in photosynthesis and kept in the cells, so uptake is slightly greater than the volume actually transpired. Over 12 minutes the difference is small, so uptake is a good estimate — but the question asked what was measured, and the honest answer is uptake.
Steam kills every cell, so nothing living remains anywhere. The poison leaves the cells structurally intact but stops them releasing energy in respiration. Two different removals, and the difference between the results is what tells you something.
So the force cannot come from anything the plant is doing. It comes from evaporation at the leaves — the transpiration pull — and the energy is supplied by the sun. That also disposes of root pressure, since the stem has no roots.
The phloem cells are still there but cannot respire, and translocation stops. So loading sucrose into the phloem requires energy from respiration and therefore requires living cells. Xylem is dead, phloem is alive, and this pair of experiments proves both halves at once.
Stem A alone would tell you nothing about the phloem, and stem B alone would leave open the possibility that the poison had blocked the vessels physically. Because the dye still rose in B, you know the xylem is unaffected, so the failure must be in the phloem. Designing experiments in matched pairs is what makes an inference safe.
The instinctive answer is “when loss is highest”, and it is wrong. Wilting begins when loss exceeds uptake by the largest margin, which here is at about 10:00 — 92 against roughly 55. Reading two curves means reading the difference between them.
Because more water is leaving than arriving, the cells lose water and become flaccid. With too little turgor pressure pressing outwards on the cell walls, the soft, non-woody tissues cannot support themselves, and the leaves droop.
As the temperature falls and the stomata begin to close, the rate of loss drops quickly. Uptake continues, so the deficit built up in the morning is repaid and the cells become turgid again. That is why a plant that wilts at midday can look perfectly healthy by evening.
The loss curve settles near 2 units rather than at zero, because a little water still escapes through the cuticle and not every stoma closes completely. When a graph disagrees with a remembered rule, the graph wins — and here the non-zero value is telling you the cuticle is a minor but genuine route.
Water uptake falls from 42 to 28 cm³ — a drop of about a third. Potassium uptake falls from 100 to 6 units — a drop of 94 %. Two very different responses to the same treatments means two different mechanisms, and saying so is the first mark.
Water enters by osmosis, which is passive and needs no energy from the plant, so removing oxygen hardly touches it. Potassium ions are taken up largely by active transport against their concentration gradient, which does need energy, so anything that reduces the energy supply reduces it sharply.
Nitrogen displaces oxygen, so aerobic respiration falls and potassium uptake drops from 100 to 18. Cold slows the enzyme-controlled reactions of respiration, so uptake drops from 100 to 24. Doing both gives the lowest value of all, 6 units, because both routes to releasing energy have been restricted at once.
Water uptake still falls at 5 °C because the molecules have less kinetic energy, so osmosis and diffusion are slower, and because a cooler plant transpires less so the pull is weaker. This is the mark most often missed, and it is there for candidates who explain every feature of the data rather than the obvious one.
The labelled carbon entered the leaf as carbon dioxide and was fixed in photosynthesis, first into glucose. The leaf then converted the glucose to sucrose and loaded it into the phloem. Note the conversion: it is the reason “glucose is translocated” is marked wrong.
The roots (22 %) and the developing pods (32 %) received the label. Both are growing and neither can photosynthesise enough for itself, so both use or store what is delivered — which is the definition of a sink. The stem’s 6 % is mostly label in transit rather than a true sink.
Other mature leaves are sources in their own right: they make more sucrose than they need and export it, so almost nothing is delivered to them. That near-zero value is the evidence, not the noise. Treating small numbers as error is one of the most expensive habits in data questions.
The 38 % still in the labelled leaf reflects carbon respired or built into the leaf itself, carbon stored temporarily as starch, and the simple fact that translocation is continuous rather than instant. Notice too that the label reached the roots (below) and the pods (above): translocation is not restricted to one direction.
Six pairs that look almost identical and have different answers. The distinction is where the marks live.
Click each node to see how the sub-topics connect. Three frameworks carry the whole topic.
Six real student answers. Find the fault before you reveal it.
Ten Cambridge-style challenge questions. Write your answer first, then reveal the model answer and the examiner’s notes.