Topic 7 looks like a memory topic and is examined as a precision topic. Almost nothing here is hard to understand — the difficulty is that a dozen pairs of words mean genuinely different things and the mark scheme only accepts one of each pair. Bile emulsifies, it does not digest. Nutrients are absorbed into the blood and assimilated by cells. Undigested food is egested, not excreted. Physical digestion changes the pieces, chemical digestion changes the molecules. Amylase makes maltose, not glucose. An enzyme secreted by the pancreas acts somewhere else. Twelve traps, six walkthroughs, six lookalike pairs, a concept map and ten full practice questions below — every one of them aimed at a place where a sensible-sounding sentence earns nothing.
Twelve traps that cost marks on Topic 7 challenge papers. Every one is an answer that sounds right and that mark schemes refuse.
Six challenge-level questions worked through in the order you should actually think about them. Try each part before revealing the next step.
Tube 1 has droplets of 46 µm; every tube containing bile has droplets of 4 µm. That is emulsification, and it is a purely physical change — the same fat, in smaller lumps. Many small droplets have a far larger total surface area than a few large ones, so lipase can reach much more of the fat, more enzyme–substrate complexes form per second, and the product rises from 11 to 58 mg. Quote both pairs of numbers; data questions reserve a mark for using the data.
Tube 3 has droplets just as small as tube 2 and produces zero fatty acid. So emulsification on its own digests nothing. Bile contains no enzyme, and this single row is stronger evidence than any definition. If you have ever written “bile digests fat”, this is the result to remember.
Tube 4 contains bile and a denatured lipase, and again produces nothing. That rules out the possibility that something else in the mixture — the cream, the warmth, the bile — produced the fatty acid in tube 2. Together, tubes 3 and 4 show the result needs both bile and active lipase.
Bile changes the size of the droplets; lipase changes the molecules. Emulsification is physical digestion and belongs with chewing and churning. Write that sentence and the mark is automatic.
P peaks at about pH 2, which is the stomach: P is pepsin, secreted by the stomach wall and acting in the stomach. Q peaks at about pH 8, which is the small intestine after bile has neutralised the acid: Q is trypsin, secreted by the pancreas and acting in the small intestine. The check that catches a swap: an enzyme placed in the wrong organ would be denatured in the only place it is ever found.
At pH 8, pepsin is far from its optimum and is denatured [term]; the shape of the active site changes so protein is no longer complementary to it [mechanism]; no enzyme–substrate complexes form, so no amino acids are produced [consequence]. Never write “killed” — an enzyme is a protein molecule and was never alive.
100 % for P and 100 % for Q may be wildly different real rates — the table gives no absolute values at all, so the two columns cannot be compared with each other. The claim is unsupported, and the strongest answer also notes that “better” is meaningless without stating the pH: each enzyme is best in its own conditions.
Percentage of a maximum, arbitrary units, dry mass, time rather than rate — each of these changes what a conclusion is allowed to say. Thirty seconds spent on the column headings is the single highest-value habit in a challenge paper.
Absorbed = 320 − 64 = 256 g. As a percentage of the original: 256 ÷ 320 × 100 = 80 %. Answering 20 % gives the fraction still in the gut — correct arithmetic attached to the wrong question, which is an expensive way to lose two marks.
The stomach and duodenum are regions of digestion. Chopping starch into maltose changes the molecules but leaves every atom inside the tube, so the mass barely moves. The ileum is the region of absorption, where nutrients actually cross the wall and leave the canal — which is why the mass collapses there. This table separates the two processes better than any diagram.
The colon absorbs mainly water, and water contributes nothing to a dry mass. That is why a region doing a great deal of work shows almost no change on this table. Most of the remaining 58 g is fibre, which has no enzyme to digest it and so can never be absorbed.
The 58 g was never absorbed into the blood or into any cell, so it is not a waste product of metabolism. Its removal is egestion. Naming the process earns one mark; the justification earns the second, and it is the half most often left out.
Bread is mainly starch, and the method uses a protease. Because of enzyme specificity, starch is not complementary to the active site of a protease, so almost nothing happens in either tube and the experiment cannot show anything at all. Always check substrate against enzyme before looking at anything else — candidates read “digestion” and stop checking.
The masses of bread are not matched, so a difference could be caused by quantity rather than by surface area — the very variable being investigated. And the temperature is uncontrolled with no measured time; “overnight on a bench” differs from day to day and from tube to tube.
It is subjective, produces no numbers, and cannot be repeated or compared. Replace it with a quantitative end point: the time for iodine solution to stop giving a blue-black colour. Then the two tubes give two numbers that can actually be set against each other.
The broken-up bread loses its blue-black colour sooner. Breaking it up is physical digestion — smaller pieces, unchanged starch molecules — and the greater surface area exposes more starch to the amylase, so more enzyme–substrate complexes form per second. An answer that says chewing “breaks the starch down” contradicts the definition it is being tested on.
Glucose rises from 31 in the stomach to a peak of 44 in the duodenum, then falls steadily to 1 in the colon. Quoting two figures is very often a mark by itself, and it forces you to notice the peak rather than describing the table as “going down”.
The rise is continued chemical digestion — pancreatic amylase and then maltase releasing more glucose. The fall is absorption through the wall of the ileum into the blood. The commonest wrong answer is “the glucose is used up”: nothing in the lumen respires, so glucose leaves by crossing the wall, not by disappearing.
The ileum has by far the largest internal surface area, produced by folding of the lining, villi and microvilli. More surface means more molecules absorbed per second, which is exactly why the glucose figure falls most steeply there. Two columns are given so that they can be read together; using only one answers half the question.
4 in the lumen against 9 in the blood is movement against the concentration gradient, so it must be active transport, using protein carriers and energy from respiration. That is why villus epithelial cells are packed with mitochondria. Osmosis is the wrong word whatever the numbers — osmosis moves water.
The condition is rickets. Child 2 has plenty of calcium and almost no vitamin D; child 3 has plenty of vitamin D and almost no calcium. Any answer naming a single nutrient as “the cause” has read only half the table — which is exactly what the design is testing.
Child 3 has nothing to build with: bones cannot be hardened with calcium that was never eaten. Child 2 has the material but cannot absorb it, because vitamin D is needed for the absorption of calcium from the small intestine. Both end up with too little calcium in the blood and therefore soft, bending bones.
Without vitamin D the additional calcium is still not absorbed. It stays in the lumen of the alimentary canal and leaves in the faeces — it is egested, not excreted, because it never entered a cell. The fix is vitamin D, from oily fish, egg yolk, fortified foods, or sunlight on the skin.
Children 1 and 4 have both nutrients and are healthy, which shows the condition is not caused by age, mass or anything else the study held constant. Pointing that out is worth doing in an evaluation question — a table without a normal row proves much less than one with two.
Six pairs that look almost identical and have different answers. The distinction is where the marks live.
Click each node to see how the sub-topics connect into one story: a meal, a tube, and a cell at the end of it.
Six real student answers. Find the fault before you reveal it.
Ten Cambridge-style challenge questions. Write your answer first, then reveal the model answer and the examiner’s notes.