Every exam paper in this topic is a challenge paper, so this is where the ramping happens. Topic 3 is the biggest mark-loser in the first half of the syllabus, and it is not because the science is hard — it is because three words go missing. Diffusion is net movement, not just movement. Membranes are partially permeable, never “semi-permeable”. And water moves down a water potential gradient, not “towards the solute”. On top of those sit the classics: plant cells said to burst, animal cells said to plasmolyse, mitochondria said to power osmosis, percentage change divided by the wrong mass, isotonic points read off the nearest data point instead of the crossing, and conclusions extrapolated far beyond the data. Twelve traps, six walkthroughs, six pairs to separate, six wrong answers to dissect and ten full challenge questions — all below.
Twelve traps that cost marks on Topic 3 questions. The first three are the ones that cost the most, so they are dealt with in the most depth.
Six challenge questions broken into steps. Try each step yourself before revealing the next — the reasoning is the point, not the answer.
change = final − initial = 4.32 − 4.50 = −0.18 g. Subtracting the other way round gives +0.18 and reverses the entire biological conclusion, so always write final first. The negative sign is telling you water left the tissue.
(−0.18 ÷ 4.50) × 100 = −4.0 %. Dividing by the final mass of 4.32 gives −4.2 % and loses the accuracy mark. Circle the initial mass in the question before you pick up the calculator, every single time.
The values run +2.0 % at 0.4 and −4.0 % at 0.6, so the line crosses zero between them, roughly two thirds of the way across at about 0.47 mol dm⁻³. Answering “0.4” because it gives the smallest number loses the mark: the crossing point is not a tested concentration.
At this concentration the sucrose solution and the potato cell sap have the same water potential, so water molecules cross the membrane equally in both directions and there is no net movement. Never write “osmosis has stopped” — it has not, and that phrase is refused.
The 1.0 mol dm⁻³ solution has a lower water potential than the cell sap, so there is a net movement of water molecules out of the cells by osmosis through their partially permeable cell membranes. The cells lose water and become flaccid; some become plasmolysed. The cylinder therefore loses mass.
Surface area = 6l², volume = l³, so the ratio is 6 ÷ l. That gives 0.6 : 1, 0.3 : 1 and 0.2 : 1. Forgetting the six faces divides every area by six; writing all three ratios the same assumes shape is what matters, when it is scale.
The 10 mm cube has the largest surface area to volume ratio, so there is more surface for every unit of volume that must be reached. It also has the shortest distance from surface to centre — 5 mm against 15 mm — and rate of diffusion falls as distance increases. An answer naming only one factor scores one mark of three.
240, 480 and 720 s rise in equal steps for equal steps of side, so time is directly proportional to the length of the side — 24 s per millimetre. For 25 mm: 25 × 24 = 600 s. Predictions are always marked as outcome plus justification, so quote the proportionality explicitly.
A large excess means the acid concentration barely falls during the experiment, so the concentration gradient stays high and constant. Using the same concentration for every cube makes that gradient a controlled variable, so any difference in time must be caused by the size of the cube. Do not write “to make it a fair test” — name the variable.
Pure water is the highest water potential of all, at 0 on this scale. Every dissolved particle lowers it, so more negative means more concentrated. The soil water at −18 is therefore more concentrated than the wheat sap at −12.
Water moves from higher water potential to lower. Wheat sap −12 is higher than soil water −18, so water moves out of the root hair cells into the soil. The plant is losing water to wet soil — physiological drought.
The cells lose water, turgor pressure falls and they become flaccid. Since a non-woody plant is supported by the pressure of water inside its cells pressing outwards on the cell walls, losing that pressure means the stem and leaves droop. That is wilting.
The grass sap is −26, lower than the soil water at −18, so the gradient still runs into the root and water enters by osmosis. It achieves this by keeping a very high concentration of dissolved solutes in its cell sap. It does not keep the salt out, and it certainly does not actively transport water — there is no such process.
Uptake increases with oxygen concentration, from 4 to 50 arbitrary units. The increase is large at first (4 to 22 between 0 % and 5 %) and much smaller later (38 to 50 between 10 % and 21 %). Description marks almost always require quoted figures, and a second mark is often available for spotting that the relationship is not linear.
The ions are already about a hundred times more concentrated inside the cells, so they are moving against the concentration gradient. That eliminates diffusion and osmosis immediately and tells you energy must be involved. Get this sentence down first — without it, nothing that follows has a reason.
More oxygen allows more aerobic respiration, which releases more energy, which is used by the protein carriers in the cell membrane to move more ions across per hour. Compressing this to “more oxygen means more uptake” scores one mark of three.
Two creditable ideas: anaerobic respiration still releases a small amount of energy, so a little active transport continues; and a small amount of movement may occur by diffusion, which needs no energy from the cell. “Experimental error” throws away a mark that reasoning would have earned.
Visking tubing has tiny pores. Glucose molecules are small enough to pass through; starch molecules are far too large. So glucose diffuses out down its concentration gradient and gives a positive Benedict’s test outside, while starch stays inside and the iodine test outside stays negative.
Benedict’s solution must be heated, and a positive result is an orange-red precipitate, not simply “it goes orange”. A negative iodine test is orange-brown — the colour it already was. Saying iodine “stays the same” is weaker than naming the colour.
The contents are a solution of starch and glucose, so they have a lower water potential than the distilled water outside. Water therefore moves into the tubing by osmosis through the partially permeable tubing, increasing the volume inside and so the mass.
The single most common error here is explaining the mass gain with glucose — but glucose was leaving. Two different substances, two different processes, two opposite directions, all at the same time through the same barrier. Write them as two separate sentences so the examiner can see you have distinguished them.
Uptake is far greater with oxygen at every concentration — for example 42 units against 8 units at the third concentration. Picking two numbers from different columns is the standard way of losing a comparison mark, so always take the pair from the same point on the scale.
With oxygen, most of the uptake is active transport through protein carriers. There is a fixed number of carriers, so once every one of them is working flat out, adding more of the substance outside cannot increase the rate — the line flattens. Saying “the cells are full” is not credited: uptake is a rate, and the cells keep using the substance as fast as it arrives.
Without oxygen there is little energy for active transport, so what remains is largely diffusion. The rate of diffusion depends on the steepness of the concentration gradient, so raising the outside concentration simply keeps raising the rate. No carriers involved, so no ceiling.
Plateau plus oxygen dependence equals active transport. Straight rise with no oxygen dependence equals diffusion. You can identify the process from the shape of the data alone, without being told anything about the substance — which is exactly the skill challenge papers are testing.
Six pairs of questions that look almost identical and have different answers. Find the distinction before you read the key difference.
Click each node to see how the three processes connect to one another and to the rest of the syllabus.
Six real student answers. Decide what is wrong and what it would score before you reveal the flaw.
Ten Cambridge-style challenge questions. Write a full answer first, then reveal the model answer with the mark allocation and the examiner’s notes.