this is a levels style question. Award up to 4 marks for benefits and limitations, at least one of each, then up to 2 for a judgement that is supported by what has gone before.
Benefits, any of:
quotas, closed seasons and limits on the number of fishing days cap the catch, so the stock has time to breed and future catches can be maintained
an increased mesh size lets young organisms escape the net, so they survive to reproduce, and it also reduces the bycatch of species that were not being targeted
sustainable methods such as pole and line take one organism at a time, so bycatch is almost eliminated and the sea bed is not disturbed
protected areas and conservation laws shelter the whole food chain rather than the target species alone, so the ecosystem that supports the fishery is kept intact
international agreements matter because stocks move across borders, and a rule that stops at a national boundary does not protect a stock that does not
Limitations, any of:
the income of fishing communities falls in the short term, and the people who lose that income are usually not the people who benefit from the recovered stock years later
monitoring and enforcement are expensive, and at sea and beyond national waters they are extremely hard, so a rule that is not enforced changes nothing
quotas can push boats to discard undersized or over quota catch dead over the side, so the organisms are killed anyway and never appear in the figures
limits on boat and net size can be worked around, for example by more boats or more trips
an international agreement binds only the countries that sign it and can be left
Judgement, up to 2 marks:
a judgement that names what the decision actually turns on, for example that these strategies work only where monitoring and enforcement exist, so the limiting factor is capacity to enforce rather than the choice of rule
a judgement that separates who gains from who pays, and over what timescale: the cost falls on this year’s fishing community, the benefit falls on a future one
a bare conclusion such as "so they are good" with nothing behind it scores 0 of the 2