Topic 7 feels like the friendliest topic on the paper. Three reactions, a colour chart, a few recipes. Then the challenge paper arrives and asks whether concentrated ethanoic acid is a strong acid, why sodium chloride cannot be made by the excess-solid method, whether a solution at pH 7 must be water, and what happens to your marks when you divide by 1000 in the wrong direction. This guide hunts every one of those traps: strong versus concentrated, rate versus amount, soluble versus insoluble, and the salt name that comes from the acid, not the metal. Work through it and Topic 7 becomes the most reliable marks on the paper.
Twelve traps that cost students marks on Topic 7 questions. Every one of them appears on challenge papers regularly.
Six challenging questions broken down step by step. Try each step yourself before revealing the next.
(a) Zinc nitrate — all nitrates are soluble ⇒ soluble. (b) Ammonium sulfate — all ammonium salts are soluble ⇒ soluble. (c) Barium sulfate — one of the two insoluble sulfates ⇒ INSOLUBLE. Write "sol" or "insol" beside each before doing anything else; the answer to (c) is already decided.
Zinc metal, zinc oxide and zinc carbonate are all insoluble, so I can add any of them in excess to dilute nitric acid and filter off the surplus. Choosing zinc oxide: ZnO(s) + 2HNO3(aq) → Zn(NO3)2(aq) + H2O(l). Key purification step: filter to remove the unreacted excess zinc oxide, then evaporate the filtrate to the point of crystallisation and cool.
Every ammonium compound is soluble, so there is no insoluble solid to add in excess and nothing to filter off. The method is forced: titration. Titrate 25.0 cm3 of aqueous ammonia against dilute sulfuric acid using methyl orange, record the exact titre, then repeat with the same volumes but no indicator. 2NH3(aq) + H2SO4(aq) → (NH4)2SO4(aq). Key purification step: repeating without indicator, so the crystals are not stained by dye.
I need Ba2+ and SO42−, each supplied by a soluble compound. Use the reliable trick: take the positive ion as a nitrate and the negative ion as a sodium salt. So barium nitrate + sodium sulfate: Ba(NO3)2(aq) + Na2SO4(aq) → BaSO4(s) + 2NaNO3(aq). Ionic: Ba2+(aq) + SO42−(aq) → BaSO4(s). Key purification step: filter, then wash the residue with distilled water to remove the soluble sodium nitrate.
Wrong turn 1: making barium sulfate by adding barium carbonate to sulfuric acid. It would work chemically, but the product coats the unreacted carbonate and the reaction stops — and you cannot separate product from reactant, since both are insoluble solids. Wrong turn 2: making ammonium sulfate by the excess-solid method — impossible, nothing is insoluble. Wrong turn 3: evaporating the barium sulfate mixture — that would leave the sodium nitrate behind with your product.
19.60 is the rough titre — it sits 0.85 cm3 away from the others and is discarded. The concordant set is 18.70, 18.80 and 18.75, all within 0.10 cm3. Mean titre = (18.70 + 18.80 + 18.75) ÷ 3 = 56.25 ÷ 3 = 18.75 cm3. Averaging all four would have given 18.96 and cost every subsequent mark.
2NaOH(aq) + H2SO4(aq) → Na2SO4(aq) + 2H2O(l). Sulfuric acid is diprotic — each molecule supplies two H+ ions — so one mole of acid neutralises two moles of alkali. Assuming 1 : 1 here would double the final answer.
25.0 cm3 = 25.0 ÷ 1000 = 0.0250 dm3. 18.75 cm3 = 0.01875 dm3.
moles NaOH = concentration × volume = 0.150 × 0.0250 = 3.75 × 10−3 mol.
moles H2SO4 = 3.75 × 10−3 ÷ 2 = 1.875 × 10−3 mol.
concentration = moles ÷ volume = 1.875 × 10−3 ÷ 0.01875 = 0.100 mol/dm3.
Mr of H2SO4 = (2 × 1) + 32 + (4 × 16) = 2 + 32 + 64 = 98.
concentration in g/dm3 = 0.100 × 98 = 9.80 g/dm3.
From the equation, 2 mol NaOH gives 1 mol Na2SO4, so moles of Na2SO4 = 1.875 × 10−3 mol.
Mr of Na2SO4 = (2 × 23) + 32 + (4 × 16) = 46 + 32 + 64 = 142.
mass = moles × Mr = 1.875 × 10−3 × 142 = 0.266 g.
Three of these depend on the concentration of free H+ at a given moment: pH, conductivity, initial rate. Three depend on the total moles of acid present: total gas, titre, and (broadly) the heat released. Group them first, and the answers fall out automatically. Both beakers contain 0.050 × 0.100 = 5.00 × 10−3 mol of acid — identical.
(i) pH: A is lower (about 1) and B higher (about 3), because HCl is fully dissociated so its H+ concentration is far greater.
(ii) Conductivity: A conducts better, because it contains more mobile ions in solution — B keeps most of its acid as intact, uncharged molecules.
(iii) Initial rate: A fizzes faster, because a higher H+ concentration gives a greater frequency of successful collisions with the magnesium surface.
(iv) Total volume of hydrogen: the same. Both contain 5.00 × 10−3 mol of monoprotic acid, so both can release 2.50 × 10−3 mol of H2. As H+ is consumed in B, the equilibrium CH3COOH ⇌ H+ + CH3COO− shifts right to replace it, so eventually every molecule reacts.
(v) Volume of NaOH: the same, 50.0 cm3 in each case, because the titration measures total moles of acid, not free H+.
(vi) Temperature rise: very similar (slightly smaller for B, since a little energy is absorbed dissociating the remaining molecules) — the same number of moles of water are formed.
Curve A rises steeply and levels off early. Curve B rises more gently and reaches its plateau later. Both plateaus sit at exactly the same height. Drawing B finishing lower is the classic lost mark — and it is the same "rate versus amount" distinction you met in Topic 6.
It cannot be a soluble basic oxide such as Na2O or CaO, since those would dissolve and raise the pH. It cannot be a soluble acidic oxide either. But note carefully: insolubility tells you nothing about the acid–base classification. Do not conclude "neutral" here — that is the trap.
It reacts with an acid ⇒ it is behaving as a base. And no gas is given off ⇒ it is not a carbonate and not a metal above hydrogen — so it is a metal oxide or hydroxide. The solution is colourless, so it is not a copper or iron compound.
A substance that dissolves in both dilute acid and concentrated alkali is by definition amphoteric. The two amphoteric oxides on the syllabus are ZnO and Al2O3. Both are white and both give colourless solutions, so observation (3) alone cannot separate them.
Both Zn2+ and Al3+ give a white precipitate of the hydroxide with a little aqueous ammonia. But only the zinc hydroxide redissolves in excess ammonia; aluminium hydroxide stays put. So X contains zinc, and X is zinc oxide, ZnO.
With acid: ZnO(s) + 2HCl(aq) → ZnCl2(aq) + H2O(l) — here ZnO behaves as a base.
With alkali: ZnO(s) + 2NaOH(aq) → Na2ZnO2(aq) + H2O(l) — here ZnO behaves as an acidic oxide, forming sodium zincate.
Both produce a salt and water, which is exactly what the definition of amphoteric requires.
mass of water driven off = 6.25 − 4.00 = 2.25 g. This water was the water of crystallisation held inside the crystal lattice; it escaped as vapour, which is why the blue crystals turned to a white powder.
Mr of CuSO4 = 64 + 32 + (4 × 16) = 160. moles of CuSO4 = 4.00 ÷ 160 = 0.0250 mol.
Mr of H2O = 18. moles of H2O = 2.25 ÷ 18 = 0.125 mol.
CuSO4: 0.0250 ÷ 0.0250 = 1. H2O: 0.125 ÷ 0.0250 = 5. So x = 5 and the formula is CuSO4·5H2O — the familiar blue crystals, which is a good sanity check.
The crucible is heated, allowed to cool in a desiccator, and weighed; this cycle is repeated until two successive weighings agree. A constant mass proves that no more water is being driven off — that is, the dehydration is complete. Without it you cannot be sure you have the true anhydrous mass.
An answer of 4.6 rather than 5 means too little water appeared to be lost, so the residue was heavier than it should have been. Two good reasons: (1) insufficient heating — the salt was not fully dehydrated, so some water remained in the residue; (2) the residue reabsorbed moisture from the air while cooling on the bench, because anhydrous copper(II) sulfate is hygroscopic (it should be cooled in a desiccator). A third acceptable answer: some solid spat out of the crucible — but note that would make the residue lighter and push x the other way, so it does not fit this data.
Copper is below hydrogen in the reactivity series, so it cannot displace hydrogen from a dilute acid. Nothing would dissolve and the method fails at the first step. Correction: use copper(II) oxide or copper(II) carbonate instead — the reactivity-series restriction applies only to acid + metal, not to acid + base or acid + carbonate.
CuO(s) + H2SO4(aq) → CuSO4(aq) + H2O(l)
The whole point of this method is that you do not need to measure. Add the solid in excess, a spatula at a time, until no more dissolves and some remains at the bottom. That guarantees all the acid has reacted, so no acid is left to contaminate the crystals.
First, it is unnecessary: undissolved solid is already the visual signal that the acid is used up. Second, it is harmful — methyl orange is a dye that would be evaporated into the crystals and colour them. Indicators belong in the titration method, and even there the preparation is repeated without indicator.
Once excess solid is present it must be removed: filter the mixture, keeping the blue filtrate (the copper(II) sulfate solution) and discarding the residue of unreacted copper(II) oxide. Without this, the crystals would be contaminated with black solid.
Copper(II) sulfate crystallises as CuSO4·5H2O. Boiling to dryness drives off the water of crystallisation and leaves a white anhydrous powder, not blue crystals. Correction: heat the filtrate gently until about half the water has evaporated and a hot saturated solution remains — the point of crystallisation, testable by dipping a cold glass rod in and watching crystals form on it. Then leave to cool slowly so that large, well-formed crystals grow, filter them off and dry them between filter papers or in a warm oven.
Pairs of questions that look nearly identical but have different answers. Spot the key distinction.
Click each node to see how the subtopics connect.
Spot the error in each student's answer. Think before revealing.
Ten Cambridge-style challenge questions. Write your answer, then reveal the model answer with mark scheme and examiner's notes.