Three experiments are carried out. In every experiment the same mass of calcium carbonate and the same volume of acid are used.
| Experiment | Form of CaCO₃ | Acid concentration / mol dm⁻³ | Time for the first 40 cm³ of CO₂ / s |
| 1 | large chips | 1.0 | 100 |
| 2 | small chips | 1.0 | 50 |
| 3 | large chips | 2.0 | 52 |
(i) Explain, in terms of collision theory, why Experiment 2 is faster than Experiment 1. [3]
(ii) Explain, in terms of collision theory, why Experiment 3 is faster than Experiment 1. [3]
Model Answer -- 2(b)
(i) Breaking the same mass into smaller chips gives a larger total surface area, so more calcium carbonate particles are exposed at the surface where the acid can reach them [1]
(i) The frequency of collisions between H⁺ ions in the acid and the exposed carbonate surface therefore increases [1]
(i) More successful collisions occur per second (the energy of each collision is unchanged), so the rate of reaction is greater and the 40 cm³ is collected in half the time [1]
(ii) Doubling the concentration means there are more acid particles in the same volume of solution, so the solution is more crowded [1]
(ii) The acid particles collide with the marble surface more often per second [1]
(ii) The proportion of collisions with energy above the activation energy is unchanged, but because there are more collisions per second there are more successful collisions per second, so the rate increases [1]
⚠ If you missed marks here: If you wrote that smaller chips or a stronger acid make the particles "move faster" or "have more energy", that is the temperature explanation applied to the wrong variable and it earns no credit. Only temperature changes particle energy. Surface area and concentration change how often particles meet, not how hard they hit. Also avoid "more collisions" without "per second" — rate is about collision frequency.